This essay first appeared in my newsletter. Sign up here if interested in F’ing up the status quo and fixing education
A 2019 LEGO survey of 3,000 children across the US, UK, and China found that in the USA, nearly three times as many kids wanted to be YouTubers (29%) than astronauts (11%). More recent surveys show this trend has only accelerated.
Most adults see this as a disaster.
“Kids today are shallow,” they lament. “They’ve lost ambition.”
But they’ve got it backward.
This shift doesn’t reflect declining ambition.
It reflects declining respect for gatekeepers—and that’s probably a good thing.
Permission vs Creation
Traditional elite careers share a common pattern: they’re permission-based.
This is valuable.
We want doctors to be thoroughly educated and certified—there are good reasons medical practice requires extensive vetting. Similarly, we don’t want untrained astronauts piloting spacecraft.
But this system has significant downsides.
Even in fields where safeguards are necessary, the gatekeeping often exceeds what’s required for competence. It becomes about status maintenance, artificial scarcity, and cultural fit.
Take medicine: While the U.S. population grew by 70 million from 1980 to 2005, the number of medical schools stagnated. Today, we face a projected shortage of 139,000 physicians by 2033, yet medical schools still reject most applicants—accepting only 41% in 2019. This artificial constraint doesn’t just limit opportunity—it harms public health outcomes, particularly in underserved areas.
More importantly, we’ve erroneously applied this high-gatekeeping model to countless fields where it’s unnecessary.
- You don’t need a journalism degree to report news effectively.
- You don’t need an art school diploma to create meaningful work.
- You don’t need an MBA to build a successful business.
Yet we push young people to seek permission in nearly every domain, even ones where direct demonstration of skill would serve society better.
Now look at YouTube.
- No degree required.
- No one to impress.
- No permission needed.
Just start making things. Your work speaks for itself, and the audience—not a committee—decides its value.
Adults worry this is a shortcut around necessary training.
But that misunderstands what’s happening.
For many domains, it’s not a shortcut but a more direct path to developing and demonstrating genuine capability.
The Crumbling Social Contract
What’s rarely discussed is why this shift is happening now. It’s not just about technology enabling new paths. It’s about the collapse of an old social contract.
Previous generations traded compliance and conformity to gatekeepers for security. Follow the prescribed path—college, corporate job, steady advancement—and you’d be rewarded with a 40-year career and a pension.
That deal is dead.
Today’s young people have watched their parents and grandparents get laid off after decades of loyalty. They’ve seen pensions vanish, college costs explode, and credentials inflate.
The gatekeepers still demand submission, but they no longer guarantee anything in return.
Institutions that once commanded automatic respect—universities, corporations, professional associations—have hemorrhaged credibility (see confidence in US higher education graph below).
Young people see universities as debt factories, corporations as fair-weather employers, and many professional credentials as rent-seeking schemes.
Given this reality, declining respect for gatekeepers isn’t rebellion. It’s rational adaptation.
The Surprising Rigor of Creator Paths
There’s a misconception that becoming a successful creator is easy or non-rigorous.
It is not.
The top 1% of YouTubers work harder than most professionals.
They’re just evaluated differently.
Traditional professionals face a hybrid evaluation system.
First, they must pass credentialing barriers (degrees, licenses, certifications), and then they’re judged on results. A lawyer needs a law degree and bar passage first, but ultimately succeeds or fails based on client outcomes, case wins, and business generation. A doctor needs medical credentials but ultimately builds a reputation on patient outcomes and peer respect.
The key difference with creators is that they skip the initial credentialing phase entirely. A YouTuber is judged solely on their output from day one. There’s no license that grants them a provisional period of audience trust.
This creates a more immediate feedback loop. A creator who produces subpar content gets immediate, measurable feedback: no one watches.
What’s fascinating is what happens next.
Iteration vs Elimination
In traditional careers, failure is often terminal.
- Don’t get into medical school? Game over.
- Don’t pass the bar? You’re not a lawyer.
On YouTube, failure is iteration.
First video gets 12 views? Make another. Learn. Adjust. Every failure contains information for improvement.
Consider Jimmy Donaldson, better known as MrBeast.
When he started on YouTube at age 13, his videos barely got any views. For years, he experimented, studied successful creators, and relentlessly improved his content. “I made daily videos for 300+ days,” Donaldson explained in an interview. “The first 100 videos only got like 40 views. I didn’t know what I was doing.”
Today, MrBeast has over 371 million subscribers, employs hundreds of people, and runs an enterprise that recent rumors suggest might be worth $5 billion.
Yes, he’s an extreme outlier. The point isn’t that your child will become the next MrBeast. The point is the process he followed: persistent iteration and learning from each video’s performance. Even creators who never reach a fraction of his scale develop valuable skills through this same process of experimentation and improvement.
This mindset—treating setbacks as data for development, not defeat and disappointment—is precisely what we hope to instill in children. Yet when they naturally gravitate toward paths that teach this mindset, we discourage them.
The Hidden Curriculum
Parents fret about kids “wasting time” on YouTube dreams instead of focusing on school. But they’re missing what successful creators actually learn:
- Communication under constraints. A YouTube video must capture attention immediately and sustain it. This is harder than writing an academic paper that a professor is paid to read.
- Genuinely independent work. School “projects” come with rubrics and teacher guidance. Building a channel means figuring everything out yourself.
- Market thinking. Creators must understand what people actually value, not what they claim to value. This is the essence of entrepreneurship.
- Compounding skills. A good creator becomes proficient in writing, speaking, design, marketing, data analysis, negotiation, and finance—all through direct practice, not theory.
What’s most striking is that these skills transfer everywhere. A student who spends three years failing to become a YouTuber has gained more applicable skills than one who spends three years in many traditional academic programs.
The Status Disconnect
So why do adults resist this shift? Because as Eugene Wei says, humans are status seeking monkeys.
Saying “my daughter is in medical school” sends clear status signals. Saying “my daughter is building a YouTube channel about science experiments” doesn’t—yet.
But we’re in transition.
The students who graduate from “YouTube University” are increasingly landing in places that traditionalists respect: startups, creative agencies, even big companies desperate for people who understand digital culture.
The irony is that parents pushing kids away from creator paths often push them towards traditional credentials that are rapidly losing value.
The End of Prerequisites
What kids intuitively understand is that we’re moving from a permission society to a proof society.
In a permission society, you need credentials before you can do the work.
In a proof society, doing the work is the credential.
Or think of it this way: We’re shifting from “qualify first, perform later” to “perform first, qualify automatically.”
From “trust the resume” to “trust the results.”
This isn’t true in all fields. You still need medical school to perform surgery. But it’s true in more fields than most adults realize.
Young people aren’t less ambitious than previous generations. They’re less patient with artificial barriers. They’re asking: “Why wait for permission when I can start creating now?”
That’s not shallow.
What Parents Should Actually Worry About
The real concern shouldn’t be kids wanting to be YouTubers. It’s kids consuming endless content without creating anything themselves.
Passive consumption creates dependency.
Creation builds agency.
A teenager spending 30 hours weekly watching YouTube is developing few skills. But one spending 10 hours creating videos and 20 hours learning from feedback is getting an education in entrepreneurship that no school provides.
The distinction isn’t between traditional careers and new digital paths.
It’s between consumption and creation.
The Future Belongs to Builders
Our economy increasingly rewards those who build audiences and leverage them to create value. The skills that make a good YouTuber—understanding audiences, creating compelling content, building distribution—are remarkably similar to those that make successful entrepreneurs, executives, and leaders.
If your child wants to be a YouTuber, the right question isn’t “How do I discourage this?” It’s “How do I ensure they’re actually creating, not just consuming?”
Because in a world where gatekeepers have less power every day, the ability to build without permission isn’t just a career path.
It’s the foundation of self-efficacy—the belief that you can affect your own outcomes. And in an uncertain future, there may be no more valuable belief.
Leave a Reply